Looking back on the increase of digitally-available content in the last five years has caused me to reflect upon the concept of Value.

Debating the relative worth of anything is a tricky business: it is both subjective both on a personal level (the worth or importance of a friendship, a job, etc), and subjective on a societal level (the worth or importance of a book, a college education, etc).

What is the relative worth of a digital work?  What is the importance?   Does the fact that it is digital affect it’s value?  How does time figure into the equation? For instance, is Tee Morris’s Morevi or Scott Sigler’s Earthcore more valuable than Nathan Lowell’s Captain’s Share or J.C. Hutchins’ 7th Son: Deceit because the former are two of the first podcast novels?  Is NIN’s Ghosts albums more valuable than the CDs released before he went for releasing digital copies on the Internet?

How does obtaining digital works for free affect how we value the work?  For instance, is an album of songs that you purchase from iTunes as important to you as the albums you buy on CD or the free version you get direct from the artist?  Is the podiobook of Matt Selznick’s Brave Men Run as important to you as the hard copy you purchased?

Perhaps a more accurate way to measure the value of a digital work is to ask about the effect of loss. Which would trouble you more, the loss of Mur Lafferty’s podcasted or PDF version of Playing For Keeps, or the loss of the hard copy you bought?

Personal Value vs. Monetary Value

Digital content has zero material production cost, and because of that, it is possible to offer it for sale at a much lower cost than a physical production. Because it is digital, in general, you can also replace it easily, if not instantly. The same cannot be said for physical goods…even next-day shipping is not instant gratification for most Internet dwellers.

How does that instant gratification change the way we make purchases, and conversely, how does it change how we budget money? Do you, personally, have a budget for online, instant purchases? Or are digital products an impulse buy?  If so, what does that say about the product’s value to you?

Because we can purchase digital products instantly, and because they can be replaced easily, I think we value them less. The relative pain of replacing them if lost is so low that we do not think about the purchase critically in the terms of the relative value to us.  We function much more on the instinctual than the reasonable level when buying digital goods.  It can be summed up in two words. WANT. CLICK.

We have the potential to consume digital products like locusts consume crops.  And like the majority of impulse buys, the majority of those purchases (iPhone games, iTunes singles, etc) transition quickly from something shiny to kipple¹ in a matter of days, sometimes even hours.

Think back. What percentage of the digital content that you have downloaded have you kept? How much have you lost track of? How much do you back up, just in case of a hard drive crash?

Capitalism is, by it’s nature, driven by consumption. There is nothing wrong with that when we apply rational critical thinking to the process of purchasing an item. My question is: has the advent of digital content fundamentally changed they way we think about purchasing goods, and if so, is that change for the better?  Or, has this change made consumption a reflex, a non-thought? In both cases, what does that say about the bond we have with the content, what is it’s relative value to us when compared to a real-world physical product?

(Note:  I edited this post after the original release, due to a mistake…edits I had made did not take the first time for whatever reason. I apologize for any confusion this may cause.)

Responses to this post:

• Considering the Value of Digital Goods @ thecommandline.net
• Value, Worth, Merit and Intangible Goods @mattselznick.com

1. [coined by Philip K. Dick in Do Androids Dream of Electric Sheep?]
   the collection of useless bits of trash we wallow in; all the paper and junk that is not recycled; decaying entropic trash

    Hwæ7! w3 G@rd3n@         in G3@Rd@gum,
    þ30dcyNIng@,             þRyM G3fruN0n,
    hu ð@ æþ3Ling@5          3Ll3n Fr3M3DoN.
    of7 5Cyld 5CeFINg        $c3@þ3N@ þR3@tum,

    m0N3Gum MægþuM,          M30D0$e7l@ 0F73@H,
    eg50d3 3orl@$.           5Yðð@N ær357 w3@rð
    f3@5C3@f7 FUNd3n,        he þæ$ fr0Fr3 g38@d,
    w30X UnD3R w0LCNuM,      w30RðMynduM þ@h,
    0ðþæ7 hiM æGHWYlC        þ@r@ ym85i7tenDR@

    0F3R Hr0Nrad3            hyR@N 5C0ld3,
    g0Mb@n GYLd@N.           þæ7 Wæ$ G0d CyNinG!
    ðæM 3@F3r@ wæs           æf73r C3nn3D,
    Ge0ng In g3@RDum,        þ0n3 G0D $3nd3
    f0Lce 70 fr0fR3;         fYr3NðearF3 0ng3@7

You can find the Old English Beowulf here, sans leetness:  http://www8.georgetown.edu/departments/medieval/labyrinth/library/oe/texts/a4.1.html

(It’s Friday before a holiday…what did you expect? Productive work?)

Links for this show:

• Pinax
• Origins 2009
• War, Season 5 of Heaven
• Fluxx and Family Fluxx
• Are You The Traitor?
• Necessary Evil
• The Cthulhu Mythos Encyclopedia

Names dropped: Kris Johnson, Jim Van Verth, Mur Lafferty, Ken Newquist, David Moore, Erin Moore, Natalie Metzger, Andy Steigle, John Cmar, Laura Burns

Download the show here.

I’m not sure about you guys, but the world is wearying me more easily these days.

It might be the last two years of absurdly hard work on my part, it might be the move back home. It might be starting a new job.  it might be all of these things, but I feel like it goes deeper than that.

Sleep can recharge the body, but how does one recharge the soul?

That’s where the weariness lies, I think. Life fatigue — the spirit is weak.  The speed at which things happen, the constant barrage of media, of the tasks you MUST do, the sense of false urgency that surrounds us today.

I was out in L.A. when I realized that I spent so much time “reasoning” things out (read: whistling in the dark), trying to control situations around me, that in the end, I felt like it was all slipping through my fingers because you cannot hold on to so much. My wife calls it living in my head. Critical thinking is good, but sometimes it’s better to feel; to drink in life instead of breaking it down so you can digest it.

The soul doesn’t exist to consume the world. It’s meant to experience, revel in, and produce beauty.

I know that all of you reading this are busy people, so I ask you, how do you take care of your soul?

Phil Plait’s latest article flew past me on Twitter today, and I was speedy enough to catch it and give it a read.

Read this before continuing: http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2009/03/24/from-distant-planets-to-the-deep-blue-sea/.

I happen to agree with him that even in times like these we need to fund scientific research, in fact, I’d point out that especially in times like these. When the economy is uncertain, it’s all too easy to gaze into the complexity of the problems that face us and want to run screaming into the arms of a comfortable superstition to make us feel better.¹

Good science brings hope. It’s good for the country’s morale. When we make progress, when we understand more about the world around us, we are made a better people. We have a goal, beyond trying to figure out just how to undo what the greed of a few has wrought.

I want to cry when I see how NASA has fared in the last 20 years, perhaps longer, because the boneheads in Congress lack the foresight to embrace science as a priority. My father worked for NASA, and I was lucky to be one of those kids exposed to the Wonder of space and science at an early age. I want my children to have the same, but these days, NASA gets more press when things go wrong than when things go right. That’s an injustice of the highest kind.  We take the Space Shuttle and other advances for granted, forgetting what marvels they are.

I could not agree more with Dr. Plait’s final statements:

It is not only possible, but I believe mandated, that all of us who love science and want to further the knowledge of humanity support each other’s endeavors. The public does in fact have a great interest in many fields of science, including space exploration, ocean exploration, biological exploration…

The key word there is exploration, and there’s enough Universe out there for everybody.

1. No, I’m not talking about Atheism or Religion here. I’m talking about the unreasonable ticks that arise in every one of us when faced with something out of our control.

photo credit: Jonathan D. Blundell

Working as a team lead in any company is especially challenging. A lead developer straddles the gap between the coders and management, forced to take communication from one side and relay it in a manner the other can understand. It’s tricky business, and it’s not something you learn in school.

Here are a few tips I’ve picked up in the last few years, some of them learned the hard way. I hope they’ll serve you well.

1. Provide Solutions: Management is looking for your expertise, even when they think they know better. Temper your speech. It’s easy to get into the habit of saying “No, that won’t work because…” Don’t throw up barriers. You’ve gotten this far in your career because you’re good at what you do, so use your experience to find the creative solution.
2. Accept Input: Listen to your developers. There are days that they’ll know more about the current state of the codebase than you well. If you are lucky, you are leading people who are talented in disciplines that you are not. Listen to these people, accept their input.
3. Make The Call: Eventually, the discussion has to end. Take the data and make the best decision you can. That’s your job.
4. Play It Straight: Be honest. When you screw up, take the blame. When it’s your team, deal with it.  Trying to hide errors just compounds the problem. Without honesty there can be no trust.
5. Share Knowledge: The most fun I have with my team at Mahalo is when we are talking about tech, sharing ideas, new code, and new methods of getting the job done. This is real team-building. As developer, we prize knowledge above most other things. Share it with your team. Learn from them as well. Don’t be afraid to ask someone to teach you a skill you’ve wanted to learn.
6. Keep It Short: Management doesn’t really care how an HTTP Request Handler works.  Keep your explanations short and to the point. Ask if they want more detail. Understand that speaking techie will alienate non-techies, and will cause a slight distrust of what you’re saying. If you cannot avoid giving a technical answer, keep it short and sweet.  It’s not their job to know how it works, they just want to know it works.
7. Choose Your Battles: Your development team will inevitably want things that management cannot provide, and management will always mandate things that are not easy to do. It’s your job to find the middle ground. That will usually mean compromise, and while it’s not pretty, it’s how the sausage is made.  Save the digging in of heels for when you really need it.  An extra button or a different way of processing a form is not worth the trouble, in general, but a new form that causes the entire database to change is worth the fight. You’re not just there to take orders…you’re the caretaker of the project. Give feedback, and if you are overruled, determine how far you’re willing to take it. Be realistic in your assessment: is it a true battle to be fought or merely an inconvenience?
8. Keep A Journal: Keep a journal of the projects you run. Take notes, so you can remember why decisions were made. There will be times that you’ll look at some piece of code and you’ll have no idea why it’s doing what it’s doing. Your journal will save you from the ever-embarrassing “I dunno.”

This is a useful exercise. When we see a person’s life through the lens of history, such as a personal hero from the past, we do not see all their failings, all their personal struggles. We see an idealized version of them, and we take the qualities of their life that we seek to emulate and attempt to graft them on to our own psyches.  We learn and grow this way, trying on stories as we would garments, and when they do not suit us, casting them off.

These days, we live in an information-rich climate. The stories surrounding us, bombarding us at times, all seem to carry something that we’d like to make part of ourselves.  I’ve found this to be especially true with the people I’ve met through my work in the podcasting community, where tales of individual drive, perseverance, and passion have turned normally shy people into the writers, musicians, and broadcasters we know and love.  There’s much that’s worthy of being emulated there.

There are times that we select beliefs or qualities that make sense to us, only to have them cause dissonance with other, more deeply-rooted attitudes. In my life, that’s been Skepticism vs. Spirituality.

To explain: I know a number of atheists and skeptics. I’ve had a number of discussions with them, and to a great degree, their arguments make a great deal of logical sense to me. My own belief in a God (capital G) has been wavering for years now, and as I make my professional life in a world of logic, the arguments put forward by my skpetic friends are appealing to me. Facts make sense, and believing in things you cannot prove makes none.

However, on a deeper level, my inner life has always been one of mysticism, symbol, and faith.  I was raised Catholic, and when I hit the point in my life when I wanted to break out of the Church, I gravitated toward other mystical beliefs: neopaganism and the occult being a major part of that. In retrospect, I can see that I moving from one ritual-based practice to another because it was the motion and poetry of the rituals that I fell in love with, not the actual theology.

In the past three years, these two systems have been causing me some serious internal dissonance. In trying to find a way to make these things work together, I’ve worked myself into a cycle of doubt that has been crippling.  One side, the logical side, tells me that all my beliefs that I cannot prove with facts are bollocks, and the other side reminds me that humans work on a deeper level than mere logic, and that Significance is not fact-based, but instinctual and symbolic. It’s a battle that is deeply troubling.

The effect of all of this is that, when I take the skeptical path, I tend to be bitter and angry, and when I take the spiritual, I’m insecure and full of doubt.  I do not like the way my life tastes when I am purely skeptical, but I worry that I will float away into a never-neverland if the spiritual should take over.

I do not know where the balance point in my own life lies, but I’m reasonably certain that I’m not the only person fighting this internal fight.  If you are one of those people with this same inner turmoil, how do you balance it? What beliefs have influenced you, shown you where your strength lies, and how did you come to your decision?

Deep breath, folks. It’s a new game out there. I’ll see you on the field.

The irony is not lost on me.

photo credit: ishkamina

First, I want to thank everyone who posted comments on my article about the Amazon Rush. When I write articles like these, I’m looking to start some discussion, and the discussion is now happening. I believe that’s a good thing, whether I’m right or wrong in my assessment.

Second, there’s a misunderstanding. I’m not criticizing how past authors have acted. I received one very angry email, asking how I could turn on my own authors this way. If that’s what you thought, let me assure you that’s not the point. The point is this: I believe that this summer saw the last major lift that people will get from this marketing tactic. What has worked in the past will not work as well in the future.

Finally, when I talk to new authors coming through Podiobooks.com, I hear a lot of “I want to do what Sigler, Lafferty, Hutchins, and Selznick have done.” Well…so does everyone. After watching how much work past authors have put into their own marketing campaigns (of which the Rush was only a piece), I need tell them that this is not a magic pony you can ride into Never Never Land. Please, listen to I Should Be Writing #99, and hear about how the “magical success” of today’s biggest podcast novelists was the result of years of work, not a single marketing tactic.

The Amazon Rush is an arrow in the quiver. As Matt Wallace pointed out, NOT to do so just because I say so is a foolish move. As Mur pointed out, I’ve never done it myself. These criticisms have merit. To you new podcast novelists out there: all I ask is that you think of a full marketing strategy for your podcast, then for your published novel when it happens. Don’t try to fly away on a magic pony.

Update: Other blogs have picked up the topic. Check these out:

• Is the Amazon Rush Dead? at Indiana Jim’s Blog
• End of the Amazon Rush? at Jason Penney’s All the Billion Other Moments
• Amazon Rush Days Aren’t Dead (They’re Just Pining for the Fjords) at SocialMediaJunkie.com
• The Amazon Rush: Comes the Apocalypse by Kris Johnson
• What We’ve Learned – Why the World Needs the Amazon Rush