Unquiet Desperation

To be awake is to be alive.

Thank you for reading Unquiet Desperation. Please consider
grabbing the RSS feed to stay updated on new articles and podcasts.

Category : Essays

Motivation and Fascination

This entry is part 2 of 2 in the series Working the Creative Project

The only way a creative project can be completed is by Progressing Forward. Common sense, but it’s easy to fool ourselves into thinking that research, consulting with peers, or reading articles like this one will somehow help complete the project.

At the end of the day, you’re either motivated to work on Progressing Forward or you’re not.  In a comment on the last article, Jared Axelrod put it this way:

Seriously, though, one of the most encouraging words I’ve ever heard is the phrase “If you really want to do something, nothing can stop you; if you don’t want to do something, anything can stop you.” Which has had an effect on me. Now, whenever I feel something pulling my attention away from the project at hand, I say “No, I really want to do this,” and I snap back to what I was doing. Or, it’s clear that what I am doing isn’t something I really want to do, and then I am content to let it fall by the wayside.

He makes three excellent points:

  1. Know what you want to do.
  2. Do it.
  3. If you get distracted by something else, see point #1.

I think that Jared’s comment strikes at the core of the problem. Progressing Forward requires Motivation.  The word means progression, coming from the Latin movere,  ”to move.”

So how do we move ourselves? It’s too easy to say we are motivated by something interests us; an interesting project is one thing, but it needs to go deeper than that.

Motivation is born of Aspiration, which is born of Fascination.

You can find something interesting, then pass it by. It will not hold you.  Something that fascinates you, that hooks into your psyche and will not let go…now that’s the stuff from which great things are created. You aspire to do something with the fascination, and that is the motivation to work. While it is possible to work on a project that does not fascinate you in some way, keeping the motivation will be more difficult1.

A Fascination is a tricky thing: they come in all sizes and shapes. some might be good for a single song, shortstory or painting. Others grow to become something epic. Most fall somewhere in between. All of them resonate. All of them have an authenticity to them that cannot be faked.

What subjects fascinate you?  Have you worked them into a project?  If you’ve worked on a fascinating vs. non-fascinating project, how did the two compare, and what did you learn from them?




  1. Money, of course, can help with this…we’re all fascinated with the possibilities of having extra cash on hand.Freelance work, anyone?[back]

The Four States of a Creative Project

This entry is part 1 of 2 in the series Working the Creative Project

It seems to me that a project is always in one of four states:
  1. Progressing Forward
  2. Assessing or Regrouping
  3. Spinning Uselessly
  4. Sliding Backward
The goal is to be in one of the first two, but most of the time we spend our time in number three or four.  In my own life, the process usually goes something like this:
  • It’s early in the project. There is excitement and motivation. I am Progressing Forward.
  • Time passes. Other things are intruding on my project. Trivial things like family, work, and sleep. I realize I’m in danger of Sliding Backwards, and so I Asses and Regroup.
  • After assessing, I swing back into Progressing forward for a few days.
  • Something stops me, either not having information, or worse, I’m having trouble staying motivated. I start to read my friends’ blogs or other online sources looking for ways to keep the project Progressing Forward. I think I am Progressing Forward, but the truth is, I’m Spinning Uselessly.
  • I start to doubt the worthiness of the project. I realize I am Spinning Uselessly, and I am ashamed of this. The project becomes a burden; instead of a joyful exercise, it is now an Obligation. I begin to avoid it, and it starts Sliding Backwards.
  • After so long Sliding Backwards, the project is no longer worth it, and it is tossed way.
The biggest challenge we have is that of consistently Progressing Forward; avoiding the distractions or using some form of Psychological Aikido to use their own force against them.

How do you foster your projects? How do you keep Progressing Forward?

For Memorial Day, I went to the birthplace of Superman.

I drove to a neighborhood called Glenville on the east side of Cleveland.  There, at 10622 Kimberly Ave, is former home of one Jerry Siegel. It was in this house where he and his buddy Joe Shuster created on of the greatest icons in world culture.

This is the place where Superman was born.

Last year, author Brad Meltzer and a group of comic fans raised over $100,000 to renovate the birthplace of the most famous fictional character of the twentieth century. He pointed out, quite fairly, the City of Cleveland was letting the house rot, and that it was going to come down to the fans to save it.

And save it, they did.

Now, there’s a sign out front, and a plaque that tells you what you’re looking it.  But unless you knew to come here, you’d never know it existed.

The house is both inspirational and heartbreaking at the same time.  It’s wonderful that a bunch of people pitched in to raise money to save it. At the same time, the neighborhood is a mess. The vacant, boarded-up houses nearby are rotting; one had a sign to ward off looters: “NO COPPER. PVC PLUMBING ONLY.”

There are no fast food joints here. No large-chain gas stations. No Seven-Elevens. Hardly any business at all.

If there was ever a place that needed a hero, Glenville is it.

And yet, sitting there in my car, looking at the house, I was inspired. Two kids, two poor, frustrated, hormone-addled high-school kids created something wonderful there. That deserves some respect. That deserves some homage; some reverence.

Superman’s fame isn’t tawdy; it isn’t cheap. Unlike Batman, it isn’t born from angst and darkness. Superman is one of the most rare creations, he’s famous for being the Good Guy. There’s a purity to Superman that is utterly lacking in in most pop culture icons. It’s his signature, his staying power; it’s why people still look to this fictional character with hope.

These two kids took a man and gave him three things: 1) Morals, 2) Strength, and 3) Bulletproof Skin1.  That’s it. That was the formula. Hardly original. in fact, other parts of the Superman myth were cribbed entirely from other sources. Doc Savage, for instance, was known as the Man of Bronze and had a Fortress of Solitude. Superman was not created in a vacuum…he was a mashup of things that came before, and he is greater than the sum of his parts.

As a creative guy, this gives me hope. There is a myth of originality that creative folks cling to, as if there is anything new under the yellow sun. All we can do is remix and recast not only without shame, but also without guile.

And greatness? Superman achieved worldwide acclaim and recognition. The Siegel and Shuster families, however, have been fighting for the rights to Superman for years.

And the house in Glenville, where the two boys drew on old pieces of wallpaper, nearly passed away entirely.

The house serves as both inspiration and cautionary tale. It is both despair and hope, both dread and faith.

And between those, it endures.

Just like all of us.

(Click below to read the plaque)




  1. In the beginning, he couldn’t fly. He could only leap.[back]

The Facebook Dilemma

This week, Ryan Singel at Wired highlighted some of the problems with Facebook’s privacy model and put out a call for an open alternative to the system.  I’d like to talk over the problem with you, dear reader, and hear what you think about what I have begun to call The Facebook Dilemma. The Dilemma, in my mind, can be broken down like this:

  1. I use Facebook to keep in touch with a number of my old friends.
  2. Facebook keeps sharing more and more of my previously private data without my permission by making things public and then expecting me to find the place in the settings where I can make it private again.
  3. If I leave Facebook, the chances are good that I will completely lose touch with many of my friends, but I am very uncomfortable with my data being sold off, piece by piece.

On Privacy

I joined Facebook when my updates were kept private between myself and my friends. Now, unless I hunt down and change the privacy settings with each “feature” that Facebook decides to add, everything I say or have ever said could be made public. There are things in those updates I would prefer stay between friends; not because they could be damaging to me, but because I do not want advetisers keying on the words and offering me services I do not want. I do not want to be datamined and marketed to1 based on things I say to my friends. This may sound quaint, but I believe a person has a right not to be pestered constantly to buy things.

For those who want to get a simpler view of how Facebook privacy has changed over the last five years, Matt McKeon has put together an excellent graphical representation of that evolution. Check it out, and realize just how much the general public and marketers can know about you now, as opposed to five years ago.

I’m not beating the drum for a mass exodus from Facebook. I do believe that ordinary, non-tech-blog-reading folks should be aware of what’s happening. There is a slow bait-and-switch occuring, where we are allowing Facebook to define what privacy means.  From Mr. Singel’s article:

Facebook thinks that your notions of privacy — meaning your ability to control information about yourself — are just plain old-fashioned. Head honcho Zuckerberg told a live audience in January that Facebook is simply responding to changes in privacy mores, not changing them — a convenient, but frankly untrue, statement. In Facebook’s view, everything (save perhaps your e-mail address) should be public. Funny too about that e-mail address, for Facebook would prefer you to use its e-mail–like system that censors the messages sent between users. Ingram goes onto say, “And perhaps Facebook doesn’t make it as clear as it could what is involved, or how to fine-tune its privacy controls — but at the same time, some of the onus for doing these things has to fall to users.” What? How can it fall to users when most of the choices don’t’ actually exist? I’d like to make my friend list private. Cannot. I’d like to have my profile visible only to my friends, not my boss. Cannot. I’d like to support an anti-abortion group without my mother or the world knowing. Cannot.

I walked up to you and said that I would be happy to let you communicate with everyone you’ve every cared even the slighest bit about, but the only catch is that I can repeat what you said to whomever asks and I can sell what you are saying to businesses so they can come to your front door and try to sell you things, you would likely tell me to get the hell out of your face.

And yet, the vast majority of people seem to be willing to make this bargain with Facebook.

I am on the fence about this. The propostion of Facebook is compelling. There are a great number of past friends that I keep in touch with on the service. I do get value out of it. Additionally, my daughter just got her first account, because this is how her friends are communicating.  Is it reasonable to expect that I would lock out new features because they open up things which I would prefer stay private?  What responsibility does the the company have to keep my information private?

Sadly, I think the answer to that last question is “none at all.”  Perhaps someone with more insight into privacy law could educate me on this, but I’m fairly certain that, unlike doctors and lawyers, there is no expectation of privacy with an online service. Facebook could sell the entire corpus of their data and there is next to nothing a normal citizen could do about it other than getting the EFF and other such groups involved. I do not believe there’s any precedent for this, but again, I’m no lawyer.

If this is the case, the best we can do is raise a ruckus or leave the service. And as long as Facebook is making money from the sale of our data and as long as the courts do not stop them, they will ignore us. As long as people are willing to feed the beast, the beast will keep eating.

On Alternatives

Mr. Singel also puts out a call for an open alternative:

It’s time for the best of the tech community to find a way to let people control what and how they’d like to share. Facebook’s basic functions can be turned into protocols, and a whole set of interoperating software and services can flourish. Think of being able to buy your own domain name and use simple software such as Posterous to build a profile page in the style of your liking. You’d get to control what unknown people get to see, while the people you befriend see a different, more intimate page. They could be using a free service that’s ad-supported, which could be offered by Yahoo, Google, Microsoft, a bevy of startups or web-hosting services like Dreamhost. “Like” buttons around the web could be configured to do exactly what you want them to — add them to a protected profile or get added to a wish list on your site or broadcast by your micro-blogging service of choice. You’d be able to control your presentation of self — and as in the real world, compartmentalize your life. People who just don’t want to leave Facebook could play along as well — so long as Facebook doesn’t continue creepy data practices like turning your info over to third parties, just because one of your contacts takes the “Which Gilligan Island character are you?” quiz? (Yes, that currently happens)

I would love to see this happen, but I do not think it would succeed.

Case in point: Identi.ca. Idenit.ca is an open alternative Twitter. In many ways, it is superior. Who is on Identi.ca?  Techies. That’s pretty much it. It has gained no strong following outside of the tech community because Twitter has the celebs, and Twitter is ubiquitous.  Yes, you can integrate them. Yes, you can syndicate from one to the other. And yet…if you want to only use the open alternative, say goodbye to the non-techie friends you have on Twitter…you’ll never see them on the open service.

An open alternative to Facebook is doomed to fail because it will only capture the imagination of techies. The vast majority of Facebook users simply will not care.  For the techies, this might be just fine. Identi.ca has become a little tech oasis, and most folks like it that way. But do not think that somehow an open alternative will frighten Facebook in any way or cause a significant change in behavior.

What’s the real alternative?

Facebook makes it so slick and so easy to keep in touch with people that going without would pose a significant challenge. How would you keep in touch with your friends? To those of us who remember a world without the Internet, the obvious answer is that some friends would inevitably drift away, and those we truly cared about would get phone calls or letters from us. In this modern age, we would read their blogs and comment, if they have them. We could send emails or instant messages. If nothing else, the time-honored Year End Holiday Letter has worked for years.

The truth of the matter is that few of these feed the real driver for updates in your social network; the powerful compulsion that causes your to refresh your email constantly, or monitor your Twitter stream to see who responded to the last clever thing you said. It’s the little shot of joy and ego you get when you finally have someone talking directly to you. It’s the attention. We all crave it, even in small doses. Since the dawn of social services, this drive has become the background hum of our lives. It takes effort not to check every minute or so to see who is paying attention to us now, or worse, to miss something “important” in the information stream. We do this in meetings on our iPhones and Droids, at our desks when we are between tasks, at home in the morning or before we go to bed.

Do we love the connection with our friends because they are our friends, or because we love the thrill of a new update? Do we really need to sell information about ourselves to keep in touch with friends, or is it simply too much effort and the ease of use makes the sale worth it? How would you function without Twitter and Facebook?

And, as a final question where is the tipping point for you? What would be the point where you would give up the ease of the connection and leave the service?

I would love to hear your thoughts.




  1. Yes. I’m aware that, for the most part, that ship has sailed. But that does not blunt my desire the thwart the bottomfeeders who pursue me for my money.[back]

Writing and Love

I know a lot writers. Some of them are of  are very good. They are good enough that, when you read their work, it fires you up, makes you want to sit down and pump out some fiction of your own.

Writing fiction is a focus of much discussion. Books, podcasts, workshop, college classes, whole degrees are focused on it. The place of tale-telling in human society has been a treasured one since the dawn of time, even before we knew to call it fiction, back when the words were myths to explain the will of the gods. It is time-honored, and some would argue, it is indispensable.

Fiction is also difficult. It takes a vivid and robust imagination to dream the dreams that lead to good fiction, and it takes even more perspiration to get the right words on the page in the right order. The agony of fiction is that the right words will refuse you, your muse will go on vacation, or you’ll lack the requisite enthusiasm to push through and complete what you have started.

It’s safe to say that 80% of the people I know have told me they want to write fiction. Less than 5% of them ever produce. Less than 5% of those ever finish a first draft. Of the last group, even fewer send their work to a publisher.

We read the writing advice blogs. We listen to the writing podcasts. We feel guilty because we do not produce. We feel like we’re falling behind, like we are not living up to our own dreams.

I submit that, maybe, just maybe, this isn’t a race. The plain truth is that many people like to write.  Writing fiction is not the only sort of writing there is.

In this age of bread and circuses where entertainment is king, we are drowning in fiction. Think of the subcultures that develop around popular fiction franchises like Firefly, Star Wars, Lost, and Harry Potter. With the dawn of computer games, interactive fiction has crossed into more people’s lives. Ask yourself, how much fiction takes up my attention per week?  I think you’ll be surprised by the answer. There’s no shame in this: fiction is, at its most basic, a useful and necessary escape from the mundane, and at it’s best, a transcendent experience which reveals something about the nature of the universe.  Fiction serves the function of dreams; release, reflection, and renewal.

And yet…it is not the only sort of writing there is.  This sounds obvious, of course. After all, we define all that is not fiction in the terms of its relationship to fiction: the word we use to describe it reflects which value more on a psychological level. We do not call it “fact” or “reality,” we call it “non-fiction.”

I have loved writing since I was a child. I have been complemented on my ability to put words together. I have been published here and there over the years, and yet, like many, fiction eludes me. I have read a great many books on the subject. I, too, have listened to the podcasts, taken the classes, gone to the workshops.  Still, I find actually writing it a chore. I do not care deeply for the characters. The situations are interesting, but only in the abstract, as facts about a world, not in relation to the human beings in the story.  In short, I care less about the writing of my fiction than I do about being known as one who writes.

There are two ways I can think to deal with this.  The first is to do what I have done for years; continue to push at it, to flog it, to to pick at it. The second is to simply admit that I enjoy writing non-fiction more, and to walk away from the fiction for now.

It is a maddening paradox: I love reading fiction and shy away from reading non-fiction for pleasure, yet I find writing non-fiction fascinating and fulfilling.  I love telling stories about real events, exploring the world around us and relaying it for those who may never experience it. I have a passion for talking about the inner lives of we humans, about how we grow, about how we find ways to carry on.  The real world, the world of human interaction and history…this is what I love to talk about.  What I love to explore. What I love to write.

I came to realize this while writing TRICKSTERS. You’ll notice there has not been a new installment for a while. I have blamed this on a number things: being busy, not known where to go next, trying to plan an interesting next step, etc.  This is, of course, crap. When I am truly honest, I know it is because I just do not care where the story goes next. I do not say this to be cruel, nor to  be a jerk. I say it because it is the truth, and I think that if a person is going to take on or continue a project, they need to be very, very honest with themselves. If you are working on a project, especially a project you hope people will read and enjoy, it behooves you to be brutally honest with yourself and, if you are not able to find the enjoyment in it, put it away for a while or stop entirely. Don’t waste your time, and do not waste your audience’s time. They will not thank you for it.

I wonder how many of you are in the same position?  I have been trying to write fiction for years because I see it all around me, because reading it makes me happy, and because, like all of us, I want to take some of the qualities of the people I admire who do write and adopt them as part of my own personality.  This works for some. For some, it is mere mimicry.

Mimicking someone you admire can serve as a good starting point, but the goal of any creative person is to find their own means of expression, their own medium, tone…voice.  Many teenagers start bands because they are inspired by an artist, and in the beginning, they sound like that artist. Eventually, the sound needs to evolve. If it does not, the band will be an also-ran, just a faded copy of someone greater. But it is also possible that the band will find something in themselves that is more fulfilling than copying someone else. This may take them out of one genre and into another, and there is nothing wrong with that. It’s a natural evolution, the discovery of their voice.

If you are a frustrated fiction writer, perhaps it’s because you need to look at other purposes for putting the words on the pages. There is nothing wrong with this. It is far, far better to find what kind of writing you are truly passionate about than to walk away completely, feeling crushed because you gave up on your dream. Your means and medium are fluid, and should change as you change.

We are writers. Go love something, then write about it.